What is pet screening is a core question for anyone renting or managing pet-friendly properties in 2024. With nearly 70% of renters now owning pets, understanding modern pet screening can protect your rental, keep residents happy, and avoid costly surprises. This guide gives you the no-spin truth behind what pet screening means, why it matters, and how to do it right.
Key Takeaways
- Pet screening is a formal, structured review of an applicant’s pet to assess risk, behavior, and compliance—much more than a handshake or photo.
- Modern platforms like PetScreening streamline documentation, risk scoring, and fair housing compliance, while also optimizing pet revenue.
- Pain points include bureaucracy, confusion about service animals, and inconsistent standards—making clear policies and fair process essential.
- 1. The Core Concept: What Is Pet Screening in 2024?
- 2. Step-by-Step Guide: How the Pet Screening Process Really Works
- 3. Advanced Analysis & Common Pitfalls: Real-life Problems (and Solutions)
- 4. Conclusion: What You Need To Remember
- 5. Frequently Asked Questions
1. The Core Concept: What Is Pet Screening in 2024?
Pet screening is a standard process used by landlords and property managers to evaluate a tenant’s pet before approving it for tenancy. In 2024, the most accepted definition involves a third-party or in-house review of the pet’s breed, temperament, size, vaccination status, and behavioral history—providing insight into insurance risk, potential property damage, and neighbor safety. The process typically generates a digital Pet Profile with documentation and a risk score (like a FIDO Score) to guide decisions on approvals and pet-related fees.

Why has it become so important? Growing numbers of renters have pets—making thorough screening essential for property protection, legal compliance (especially around assistance animals), and avoiding insurance headaches. The approach has shifted from basic interviews and handwritten notes to robust digital platforms, ensuring consistency and detailed records. Services like PetScreening now offer third-party assessment, reporting, and simplified verification for all types of animals, not just traditional pets.
If you’re refreshing your rental policies alongside new home improvement trends or thinking about a pet-friendly upgrade, understanding pet screening is as important as knowing your local fair housing laws or recent renovation best practices.
2. Step-by-Step Guide: How the Pet Screening Process Really Works
Getting pet screening right involves several steps. Here’s a realistic, actionable approach to avoid confusion and save time, whether you’re a landlord or a pet-owning tenant:
-
Define the Pet Policy: Nail down specifics in your lease addendum, including:
- Acceptable species (cat, dog, small mammal, etc.)
- Breed, size, and weight limits
- Vaccination and licensing standards
- Behavioral expectations (no aggression, excessive noise, etc.)
This clarity helps avoid later disputes and keeps your property insurance valid. For real-life examples, consult Landlord Studio’s guide.
-
Collect the Application Information: Tenants must provide:
- Age, breed/type, and size of the pet
- Medical history (including vaccinations and spay/neuter status)
- Behavioral disclosures (history of bites, aggression, damage, training certificates)
- Ownership timeline and references (previous landlord or vet)
Digital platforms auto-request these and offer structured online forms for a hassle-free process, but paper is also valid if digital isn’t possible.
-
Verify Documentation: Key documents include:
- Proof of vaccinations and flea/tick treatment
- Spay/neuter certificate
- Recent pet photos and matching description
- References from previous landlords or neighbors (if available)
Platforms like Second Nature may conduct extra checks, including calling the listed veterinarian for confirmation.
- Behavioral & Liability Assessment: Third-party systems assign liability scores, check for breed or insurance restrictions, and may calculate a FIDO Score (risk rating) using all the data. This step can flag issues like aggression, unauthorized pets, or breed bans imposed by your homeowners insurance.
-
Decision & Fees: With all evidence in hand:
- Approve the pet (possibly with a tiered pet deposit/fee or rent if risk is higher)
- Deny approval if risk is excessive or documentation incomplete
- Set clear terms for future compliance (noise, damage, insurance)
Landlords use this step to maximize revenue—users of PetScreening report a 22% average pet-related revenue increase, as more pets are approved confidently without extra risk.
- Fees & Turnaround: Most digital platforms remain free for landlords (as seen with PetScreening), while tenants usually pay a flat fee for the screen—plus any deposit or monthly pet rent based on the risk score. Processes are digital, and can often be completed within 1–2 business days, though exact timelines can vary.

For a step deeper into practical rental protections, see pet screening best practices and how this integrates with broader tenant screening or lease setup workflows.
3. Advanced Analysis & Common Pitfalls: Real-life Problems (and Solutions)
Pet screening is rarely perfect. Here are the biggest challenges—plus data-backed solutions:
- Overly Bureaucratic: Many tenants see the process as unnecessary or redundant—especially if their pets have a spotless record or previous landlord references. Cutting unneeded paperwork (for example, not asking for the same info twice) saves time and goodwill.
- Assistance Animal Confusion: Fair Housing law requires different treatment for service and emotional support animals (ESAs). Landlords must verify, but may not impose deposits, pet fees, or blanket breed bans—and must avoid discrimination by keeping verification objective and uniform. Platforms now offer HUD/FHA-compliant ESA verification to help avoid lawsuits or bias claims (see here).
- Unverified or Self-Reported Data: Relying solely on tenant-provided info can allow underreporting of behavior problems or hidden breed types. Always request photo ID and, when possible, third-party vet/landlord confirmation.
- Inconsistent Criteria or Pricing: Pet deposits, restrictions, and required paperwork vary by state and property—an inconsistent approach opens the risk of accusations of bias or discrimination. Use standard checklists and reference legal best practices to avoid this pitfall.
- Fraud with Assistance Animal Letters: With increasing cases of bogus ESA labels to bypass pet rules, third-party screening for ESA documentation (which checks issuing professionals and matches records) is growing. Combating fraud is now a top emerging trend in rental housing.
How do platforms compare? Here’s a fast breakdown based on current research:
| Platform/Service | Criteria | Features | Costs | Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PetScreening | Breed, weight, age, vaccination, behaviors; community rules | Pet Profiles, FIDO Score, ESA verification (HUD/FHA), integrations | Free for landlords; tenant pays fee | Standardized risk, 22% avg pet revenue gain, legal compliance |
| General Third-Party (Landlord Studio, Second Nature) | Breed/size/age, vaccination history, behavior | Liability scoring, references, risk reports | Varies; often tenant-funded | Informed decisions, fewer insurance/incident risks |
| Manual/In-House | Pet resume: type/breed/age/vaccinations | Interviews, photo/ID checks, vet check-in | No platform fee; potential deposits/fees | More subjective, possible inconsistencies |
Statistically, platforms report increased pet revenue by up to 22.2% after implementing standardized screening. However, there are not yet published numbers linking screening directly to reduced property damage or nuisance complaints—though anecdotal evidence from managers supports fewer headaches and more reliable tenant experiences.

If you’re about to begin renovations or are trying to evaluate home remodeling near me options that add pet-friendly amenities, proper screening can help protect those new investments.
4. Conclusion: What You Need To Remember
Pet screening in rentals has evolved from casual questions to a robust, tech-driven process with significant upside for both landlords and tenants. The most effective approaches are clear, consistent, and legally compliant—avoiding discrimination pitfalls while protecting property value. Make sure your screening process is up-to-date, includes proper verification, and leverages available tools for risk scoring and revenue optimization. Whether listing a unit or submitting an application, knowing what is pet screening helps you avoid common mistakes and enjoy a safer, more profitable rental experience.
Ready to set up pet screening for your rental? Explore expert tips and best practices, or see related rental and pet topics below. For tenants: come prepared, and you’ll breeze through—even with your furry companion.
5. Frequently Asked Questions
Is pet screening required by law?
No. Pet screening itself is not a legal requirement, but verifying service and assistance animal status (under FHA) is required, and many insurance policies require breed or behavior disclosure. Using a formal process reduces risk and proof of due diligence.
How much does pet screening cost tenants?
Fees vary—third-party platforms typically charge tenants $20–$35 per pet application. Most landlords using digital tools do not pay out of pocket, but tenants may also face variable pet deposits or rent based on the risk score.
Can landlords deny pets after screening?
Yes, if the screening reveals excessive risk (such as bite history or breed/insurance exclusions), a landlord can deny based on documented, consistent policy. However, assistance animals (service/ESA) cannot be denied solely due to breed or size, provided legal verification is completed.
What information do I need for a pet screening application?
Pet details (breed, age, size), vaccination records, spay/neuter status, photos, medical and training history, landlord or vet references, and for assistance animals, documentation from a healthcare professional.
What are common mistakes landlords make with pet screening?
Relying purely on self-reported data, skipping documentation, not distinguishing between pets and assistance animals, inconsistent policies between applicants, and charging unlawful deposits for ESAs or service animals.
